+15182546836

Scam reports relating to Zone 1 (NANP Area) telephone numbers
Post Reply
User avatar
DodgyDialersReport
Report Posting Cyborg
Posts: 31061
Joined: Sat Feb 08, 2020 8:18 am
Location: Hanging on the telephone

+15182546836

Post by DodgyDialersReport »

This topic gives information about the telephone number +15182546836, which has been identified as being used by scammer as part of their scam. This first post gives some general information about the telephone number, such as the country/area it is from, the type of number and the provider. Additional posts give information about occurrences of the number being used as part of a scam.

About telephone number +15182546836

Telephone number +15182546836 has a country code of 1, which indicates that it is from the North American Numbering Plan (NANP) area. The area code (518) indicates that the number covers the State of New York, USA and the Exchange Code (254) indicates that the number covers the town or city of Cobleskill. This Exchange code was originally designated for Landline usage and the original service provider was "VERIZON NEW YORK INC.". Number Pooling is active in this exchange and this sub-allocation of numbers is allocated to "BANDWIDTH.COM CLEC, LLC - NY".

User avatar
DodgyDialersReport
Report Posting Cyborg
Posts: 31061
Joined: Sat Feb 08, 2020 8:18 am
Location: Hanging on the telephone

Re: +15182546836

Post by DodgyDialersReport »

Telephone number +15182546836 is being used on a fake domain discretepackagemovers.com, which claims to belong to a company called "Discrete Package Movers". The website gives the following contact details:
Head Office USA
1 Marietta Blvd Bolton Dr. NW, Atlanta, Georgia 30318, USA
Email
info@discretepackagemovers.com
Phone
+1(518) 254 6836

Domain
Site Name
The WhoIs record for the domain discretepackagemovers.com gives the following information.
Creation Date: 2017-09-12T07:00:00Z
Registrar Registration Expiration Date: 2020-09-12T07:00:00Z

Registrant Name: Domain Administrator
Registrant Organization: See PrivacyGuardian.org

Post Reply